GitHub vs. GitLab vs. Bitbucket: Which code repo should you choose?

GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, questionCode repository choice is quite an essential step. However, which factors are better to consider while making the choice? Let’s look at both sides of each repository.

Nowadays, code repositories have transformed into convenient helpers for software developers, especially those who work in large teams all over the world. Project progress became a few times faster since such repositories were introduced. But when a team wants to choose the right place to store their code, which factors should be considered? Here are three most common and trustworthy repositories for you to look at closely. So, if you have doubts, follow up!

What are the main features of a good repository?

Repositories or VCS (version control systems) can be of three main types:

  • Local – All the software developers are in the same system of files.
  • Centralized – There is one copy of the project on the main server, and each member of the team can provide changes to this copy document.
  • Distributed – Each part of the team has its own local repository, and the changes are distributed between them.

We will mostly talk about Git repositories, as they have proven to be the best for the development teams. So, let’s figure out what contains a good repository.

  • Pull request. Every time when users make changes in the source code, all the people in their network or their colleagues are notified about an update or change. It is convenient for further team discussions.
  • Web-based review of the code.
  • Editing. If a repository has a capability of online and group editing, it tells a lot about its quality.
  • Bug tracking. Well-known fact states there is no project that is bug-less. It is cool and simplifies a task, when a repository tracks and fixes bugs online with a team.
  • If a repository works with “markdown syntax” it adds to the code readability a lot.
  • Two-factor authentication is important to make sure the data is secure.
  • The capability to make ‘forks’ or duplicates of repositories.
  • Snippets support that allows users to share parts of code or files with others, like team members or even themselves, if needed.
  • Ability to cooperate with third-party services.
  • Import of repositories. When users shift from one service to another, it’s a great option if repositories allow to import the work done.
  • Open source license is a good sign for some situations. It is a common practice for organizations when they want to create an internal repository within their own servers and not use any public web services. Out of three repositories under circumspection, only GitLab has an open source license. The system has friendly interface and is easy to operate in.

Continue reading about Technologies

  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next